Maggie Thatcher, PM, guided British politics for over 10 years




Margaret Thatcher, British conservative prime minister


DID I DO SOMETHING ELSE WRONG? - Yes Maggie, you made the United Kingdom a veritable concentration camp for the young looking to build a life for themselves.


There is a simple way of averting the housing crisis, to make proper accommodation affordable and relieve the stresses of life on young families, but a dyed in the wool politician with connections to big business will never go that route for fear of upsetting all her fat-cat landlord allies in the Conservative Party. For years councils like Wealden have been allowing wealthy landlord supporters to milk the housing benefits trough instead of building affordable housing. Councils control the housing stocks under the present planning system, not the Government - who are frightened of upsetting an inequitable system regardless of the National Debt and the human suffering they are causing by not doing the right thing.



Margaret Thatcher's policies were responsible for enslaving millions of young families financially. British politics harks over the Empire days that were built on cheap labour in other countries to support a lifestyle in the UK for a ruling class.


This ruling class enjoyed military superiority that finally led to the phrase: Rule Britannia, "Britania" rules the waves. That was only after we'd finally quashed the Dutch naval forces that were trouncing us in the 17th century and after employing privateers who were typically pardoned pirates given a new title.


In typical fashion convicts, the result of an inequitable three-tier society were shipped out to British colonies, mostly to Australia, until we realised that people were deliberately committing crimes to escape from their slave masters. Australia, like America, was seen as a land of opportunity. Who'd want to stay in England when our politicians don't see the general populations as human beings that they should be caring for, but an asset to be drained until death.


These policies have milked the working class like no other Government before and they continue to do so under the leadership of Theresa May, though it is not too late for the Prime Minister to do something about it. In fact that could be her trump card if she gets a move on - and enacts planning legislation to put things right.




Why not remove fees for any planning application that is either genuinely affordable or genuinely sustainable. We'd also advocate a direction that council's must identify land for affordable housing - and perhaps limit the build of luxury properties until their quota of affordable houses had been installed, typically as flatpacks with micro generation and other smart features.


Is this likely to happen? Pigs might fly. Why? Because, although it is entirely possible to make this happen, existing housing stocks will be devalued overnight.


Put yourself in the position of a young couple looking for a good deal on rent as a first stage before buying a home of their own. One unit is offered to you for £750 a month and another with the same area for £250. Obviously, you'd go for the cheaper accommodation, meaning that landlords who can command a high price for their properties at the moment, would be left with flats and houses that nobody would take at the high price.


Rents would tumble.


Is this a bad thing? Not really. Landlords do not work for their money and make far too much to sustain a decent lifestyle. They are being greedy. All we achieve by building affordable houses is that we distribute the wealth of the nation fairly, to those who genuinely need a helping hand.


Side benefits would be a reduction in the crime rate and less strain on the National Health system.







What with the withdrawal of milk for school children and the Poll Tax, is it any wonder that Margaret was finally dethroned. The only wonder is that it did not happen sooner.



THE TELEGRAPH APRIL 2013 - Margaret Thatcher: why is she still so demonised?


It is impossible to imagine any other politician arousing such a degree of public hatred. 

Many time-honoured social conventions have been discarded in recent times in our headlong rush to demonstrate how modern and relaxed we have all become, but we still, more or less, stick to the maxim of “not speaking ill of the dead”. At least not in the immediate aftermath of their demise, when their families’ grief is still raw.

Yet news of the passing of the frail 87-year-old Baroness Thatcher, so confused that she had to be reminded almost daily that her husband was dead, was greeted with street parties in Brixton, Bristol, Leeds, Liverpool and Glasgow. In south London, the scene of rioting in 1981 during her first term in office, the letters on the billboard outside a cinema were rearranged by masked vandals to read “Margaret Thatchers dead LOL [Laugh Out Loud]”. In Glasgow’s George Square, revellers drank champagne, wore party hats and sang, “Ding, dong, the witch is dead”. In Leeds, they shared a celebration cake. In Liverpool they gathered for a “death party”, and in Bristol joined forces under the banner, “May she never RIP”. 

Cold comfort, then, for her children, neither of them saints, but still human beings trying to absorb the loss of their mother. We all have a mother, so we should all have enough empathy to imagine a little of what they are feeling. But apparently not.

Of course, Margaret Thatcher, as a three times prime minister whose economic, political and social legacy remains alive and hotly disputed to this day, wasn’t any old mother. And so some, mainly on the political fringes, appear to regard her as such a hate figure that the normal rules of engagement don’t apply.

The most mainstream voice to be heard in this mob was that of Radio 4 regular Mark Steel, who tweeted: “what a terrible shame – that it wasn’t 87 years earlier.” In the chorus was Socialist Worker – circulation under 8,000 and admittedly probably not on order at Mark or Carol Thatcher’s newsagents – with a front-page mock-up of her tombstone and the word “Rejoice” in capital letters. (The editor was too busy yesterday to take a call asking for an explanation of the image.)

And there too, inevitably, was George Galloway MP, never one to mince words when he might make headlines, with: “May she burn in the hellfires.” It is, as far as I can remember, the first time a recently deceased figure has been pushed so publicly and unceremoniously into the medieval pit since the death in 2002 of the Moors Murderess, Myra Hindley.

So has a line been crossed? There is an argument that says that, in life, Margaret Thatcher relished controversy, so why should we think she would object in death? As countless retired cabinet ministers, one-time opponents and commentators have remarked, she enjoyed a fight, adopted a presidential style that dispensed with distinctions between herself and her policies, wasn’t above flamboyantly rubbishing even close colleagues (notably Geoffrey Howe, albeit with disastrous consequences), and, in the words of her biographer the late Hugo Young, “cared little if people liked her”. Presumably in death she will care even less.

“The first thing to note,” says Oxford social anthropologist Kate Fox, author of Watching the English, “is that those celebrating so openly represented a tiny number. [Police estimates put the total nationwide at around 800.] A lot of people may have been thinking the same when they heard the news. I’m a typical lefty liberal and I certainly won’t be shedding any tears. But there is a difference between thinking it and shouting it on the streets or on social media in such a tasteless way.”

Fox also challenges the notion that the scenes in some of our largest cities on Monday night were anything new. “If we can cast our minds back before the era of 24-hour rolling news, these people were not the first to mark a death like this. I imagine the end of Richard III might well have been greeted by something similar.” In 1822 jeering was reported along the route of the funeral cortege of the deeply unpopular foreign secretary and Leader of the House of Commons Lord Castlereagh, although it is said that this was exaggerated by the radical press, forerunners perhaps of Socialist Worker.

Another curious feature of Monday night’s protesters was their age. Most were too young to have been alive when Margaret Thatcher was prime minister. Saul Adamczerwski, who carried a banner in Brixton reading “the bitch is dead”, explained to reporters: “She was so particularly evil and hated by everyone”. But he was two when she left office, so how does he know?

“It is likely that there was something going on that was about more than dislike of Mrs Thatcher,” suggests Kate Fox. “Indeed, I doubt if many of the young people there were even trying to make a serious point. There aren’t many opportunities for rioting and dancing in the street. They sensed this might be one. Anthropologists have a name for such moments – 'cultural remission’. The death of Mrs Thatcher legitimised their deviance because it was a time when the normal rules were briefly suspended.”

Others, though, see this outpouring of hatred as more focused. The comedian and actor Alexei Sayle grew up in Liverpool and has been an outspoken critic of the blight of unemployment and hopelessness visited on his city by the economic reforms of the Thatcher era. “I personally am not interested in taking to the streets to celebrate her death,” he says. “I don’t care enough to do that. Thatcher dying is less tragic than David Cameron still being alive. But I understand the anger that people still feel about what she did, even if it can seem a bit incoherent after so many years.”

Among those trumpeting most unambiguously that they will not be mourning her passing have been representatives of the mining communities left redundant after the pit closures that followed the defeat of Arthur Scargill’s strike. Many still hold her responsible for their current economic woes. “I know some will say that they are just living in the past, trying to pin the blame on her rather than themselves,” Sayle says, “but it is hard not to live in the past when your future has been annihilated.”

However divisive her legacy, some aspects of her demonisation in the past 48 hours are extreme by any standards. The use of “witch” to describe her harks back to the medieval inquisition that targeted women as figures of hatred, and used the popular anger whipped up by such scapegoating to justify torture and murder.

Does such an outpouring of bile against an individual come more readily to those on the Left than those on the Right? Whatever the views of some activists, it is hard to imagine UKIP quite so shamelessly delighting in the demise of Jacques Delors, architect of all that they loathe and despise about the European project.

Indeed, it is equally impossible to contemplate any politician, of whatever hue, from the grey generation that followed Margaret Thatcher – arguably another of her legacies – exciting such enduring hostility. The one contemporary name that might just stir enough animosity to allow Thatcher one day truly to rest in peace is that of the man she is reported to have regarded as her true heir – Tony Blair.

His legacy is equally divisive and Blair has one over her in that the visceral dislike of him seems to exist on Left and Right in politics. Still, it is hard to imagine that when the moment comes, news of his departure will be celebrated in the streets with cries of “to hell in a hand cart with the warlock”.





 Thatcherism - it is unfortunate that Glenda Jackson's comments about Margaret Thatcher are quite correct. The fact that Margaret got so much so wrong for so long, does not do away with the fact that she was allowed to lead the company 














This website is Copyright © 2018 Kismet Girls Trust.   All rights reserved.  All other trademarks are hereby acknowledged.